iscoverLimited recourse borrowing arrangements with unusual assets continue to face obstacles in ensuring compliance, despite the release of a recent tax ruling.
Holes remain after SMSF loans tax determination
11 October 2016
•
5 minute read
Last month, the ATO further clarified its position on LRBAs and related-party loans through TD 2016/16. You can read about the TD in full here.
Despite this guidance, SMSF Association head of technical Peter Hogan said the criteria for determining whether a borrowing arrangement is on arm’s-length terms for assets such as units in a unit trust and private company shares remain unclear.
You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
There is currently no safe harbour guidance for these specific types of assets and third-party lenders are unlikely to ever offer loans for them, Mr Hogan said.
“Third-party lenders would be reluctant to use them as security for a borrowing, so the members are forced to borrow externally using other assets and then enter into a related-party loan with their super fund,” he said.
“So what sort of criteria would apply to those loan arrangements? Clearly they’re going to be struggling to find arm’s-length third-party providers, as they would be reluctant to lend in those circumstances.
“There are no public or external features of that type of loan arrangement on the market because generally lenders won’t lend on that sort of criteria. I think there’s still a need for some clarification on those sorts of issues,” Mr Hogan added.
He said he expects the ATO to release further clarification on this as the 31 January deadline approaches for related-party loans.
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
