Login
iscover
A mid-tier firm has praised the ATO for granting trusts an additional seven years to repay certain corporate beneficiary entitlements and releasing an accompanying practical compliance guideline.
Newsletter
ATO guideline gives clients ‘breathing space’
26 July 2017
•
9 minute read
Last week, the ATO released guideline PCG 2017/13, allowing trusts to refinance unpaid entitlements of corporate beneficiaries for an additional seven years, where those unpaid entitlements were due to be repaid by the trust by either 30 June 2017 or 30 June 2018.
You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
Speaking to Accountants Daily, Pitcher Partners tax consulting executive director Greg Nielsen said that the new opportunity gives affected taxpayers some “breathing space”.
“Over the next couple of years, those taxpayers who had entered into these arrangements when they first commenced back in 2010 would be due to be paying out some substantial liabilities over to their private companies or private companies that they are associated with,” he said.
“What the commissioner has allowed is for the taxpayer to effectively refinance those amounts which otherwise would've been payable in full over the next couple of years, and that refinancing will effectively extend those payment liabilities to be re-payed over another seven years from 2018.”
Mr Nielsen said that accountants must review the new guideline and meet with impacted clients as soon as possible.
“Accountants need to be doing a thorough review of their clients' loan accounts to identify these relevant sub trust liabilities and then determine, or work out, with their client what is the best strategy to deal with those liabilities,” he said.
“So whether or not to take advantage of this treatment offered by the tax office, and in doing so then making sure all of their documentation is in place by the critical date in order to take advantage of this concession.”
While Mr Nielsen is pleased that the ATO has done something to address this issue, he believes that there may have been better options.
“There might be other options they could’ve adopted which would’ve been more reasonable again for taxpayers, but it's certainly better than the alternative, which until this practice guide came along, would've forced taxpayers to suddenly have to find the necessary funds to pay these amounts back in one lump sum,” he said.
You are not authorised to post comments.
Comments will undergo moderation before they get published.