NTAA calls for greater clarity on WRE draft ruling

Business

The accounting body has asked the ATO to provide greater detail in its draft ruling on its work-related expenses standard deduction, which is projected to impact nearly half of all taxpayers.

14 October 2026 • By Carlos Tse • 4 minutes read
Share this article on:

An estimated 6.2 million workers, or 42 per cent of taxpayers, are to benefit from the $1,000 standard deduction for work-related expenses (WRE) in the 2026–27 income year.

In its submission to the ATO’s draft Law Companion Ruling LCR 2026/D5, The standard deduction for work-related expenses, the National Tax & Accountants’ Association (NTAA) raised concern about the absence of three pay-as-you-go (PAYG) withholding provisions in its ruling.

Individuals deriving income from these PAYG provisions, payments under a voluntary agreement, payments under a labour hire agreement, and attributed net personal services income are not eligible for the standard deduction, NTAA noted.

“Notwithstanding that the payer is required to withhold from those payments and that the individual may be performing work indistinguishable from that of an employee working alongside them,” the submission said.

It recommended that the final ruling clarify that these categories “are not assessable labour income, and that an individual who derives only such payments will not be eligible for the standard deduction”.

Foreign employment income

Further, the submission expressed concern about eligibility where an Australian tax resident employed by a foreign entity with no sufficient connection to Australia may derive “assessable salary or wages income in respect of which no withholding obligation arises”.

 
 

“It does not specifically address whether the definition is satisfied where the payer is not within the PAYG withholding system at all,” NTAA said.

It recommended that the ruling distinguish “eligibility for the standard deduction where an Australian tax resident derives assessable foreign employment income from a payer that has no PAYG withholding obligation versus a payer with a PAYG withholding obligation”.

Further, in the circumstances where an individual is a part Australian resident for tax purposes, the submission stressed that the draft ruling does not expressly state that the standard deduction is “apportioned for a part-year Australian tax resident and should include an example involving an individual who becomes or ceases to be an Australian tax resident during the income year”.

Administration

The submission said that the ruling does not explain how the deduction amount will be administered and applied.

“Paragraph 27 states that, where a taxpayer is eligible, the ATO will determine their standard deduction amount when they lodge their tax return, based on the information in the return,” it said.

NTAA’s members have been asking whether the standard deduction amount will be visible in the tax estimate produced before the return is lodged, whether it will be itemised on the notice of assessment, whether the taxpayer needs to attach a label to indicate that they are receiving the standard deduction, and whether the outcome is “determined by the ATO solely by the amounts entered at the deduction labels”.

“NTAA reiterates the observation in its Treasury submission that effective communication of the commencement will be crucial, and that there is a real risk that taxpayers will associate the new standard deduction with their 2025–26 returns rather than their 2026–27 returns,” it said.

Accountants DailyWant to see more stories from trusted news sources?
Make Accountants Daily a preferred news source on Google.
Tags: