Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

ASIC slammed for interfering in minimum balance debate

ASIC has been told to maintain a purely regulatory role and stay out of debate around SMSF minimum balances.

News Staff Reporter 14 August 2015
— 1 minute read

In comments made to AccountantsDaily's sister publication SMSF Adviser, Olivia Long, CEO of XpressSuper and Superguardian, spoke of her “surprise and dismay” upon learning of comments made by ASIC in which the regulatory body stated “the costs of establishing and operating an SMSF with a balance of $200,000 or below are unlikely to be competitive, compared to a fund regulated by APRA”.


Ms Long said she disagrees with both the ASIC statement and the regulator’s decision to make such a comment.

“There is simply no evidence that SMSF’s with balances of less than $200,000 are run less efficiently than their wealthy counterparts,” she said.

Ms Long also made particular reference to the 2010 Cooper Review and the 2014 Financial System Inquiry which both looked at setting a minimum balance as a pre-requisite for establishing an SMSF.

“After examining all the evidence, neither of these vigorous inquiries thought there was any merit in the suggestion.”

Despite the presence of prior investigation into the matter, “the thrust of this ASIC edict is self-evident; they want to discourage people to set up a SMSF with a starting balance of $200,000 or below”, according to Ms Long.

“It seems the conclusions of two inquiries is not enough for some people,” she added.

Quick to point out that there is a lack of attention and appreciation for those who are taking superannuation fund management into their own hands, Ms Long said “people adopting such a responsible approach to their superannuation should be encouraged”.

The SMSF sector, boasting approximately $600 billion in FUM, has frustrated the retail and industry funds, according to Ms Long, as they deal with a large migration of members away from their services as they edge toward retirement.

Although noting that ASIC has effectively targeted spruikers and advisors who prey on the vulnerable in the past, Ms Long reiterates that it should maintain a strictly regulatory role.

“It is not ASIC’s role to enter the debate about the parameters of which the SMSF sector operates,” she said.

ASIC slammed for interfering in minimum balance debate
image intro
accountantsdaily logo